Start with the institutional holdings

The most reliable starting point is a museum or national collection that already holds his work. Search the online catalogue of a major Polish museum and filter by the artist's name. These records usually include a date, a medium, and sometimes a provenance note, which is more than most unofficial galleries offer.

The catch is that holdings are incomplete. A museum may own one drawing and nothing else, which is still useful as a reference point but not a full survey. Treat each institutional record as a fixed point rather than a complete picture. Cross check the date and medium against what you see elsewhere before drawing conclusions.

Use a dedicated archive or catalogue

A dedicated archive is the closest thing to a browseable survey, and it is where you are most likely to find a coherent sequence of works. Look for a project that has attempted to list his output in a single place, ideally with images and dates arranged in order.

The problem is that such resources are often partial, outdated, or hard to navigate on a phone. Some are built by enthusiasts rather than institutions, and image quality varies widely. When you find one, check whether it distinguishes between originals, reproductions, and later copies before you treat it as a body of work.

Read the catalogue alongside the images

A catalogue or exhibition checklist gives you the structure that images alone cannot. It tells you what the compiler considers finished work, what is a study, and what may be misattributed. That matters because Szukalski's output includes drawings, sculptures, and written material, and not every page online will say so plainly.

When you want to see where to see Szukalski's full body of work, the catalogue is often the map rather than the destination. Use it to decide which images are worth chasing down in higher quality, and which are only tangentially related. A good checklist reduces the noise more than a large gallery grid ever will.