Lois Mailou Jones Moved Toward Abstraction, and It Shows

Jones is remembered for portraits and still lifes, but her later decades belong to pattern, mask forms and near-abstract design. Here is where that shift happened and what it looks like.

Auvrique Editorial · Fine Art Editions

The short answer

Yes. Lois Mailou Jones painted abstractly, especially from the late 1960s onward, when African masks, textiles and Haitian imagery pushed her work toward bold pattern and flattened design. Her earlier work, roughly the 1930s through the 1950s, is mostly figurative, so the abstract art by Lois Mailou Jones clusters in the last third of a career that spanned more than six decades.

A Long Career With Two Distinct Modes

Lois Mailou Jones worked for more than sixty years, and the work divides cleanly into two modes. The early decades are figurative. Portraits, landscapes and still lifes, often painted with a careful, academic hand she had learned in Boston and refined during her years in Paris. Anyone who knows her only through these pictures could reasonably assume she never painted abstractly at all.

The assumption breaks down after mid-century. From the 1960s onward, Jones turned hard toward pattern, symbol and flattened composition. Masks, textiles and African design sources became the engine of the work, and the figures thinned out or disappeared. So the honest answer to whether Lois Mailou Jones paints abstractly is that she did, but on a delay. The shift is real and easy to see once you know where to look.

What Her Abstractions Actually Look Like

The later paintings are not gestural abstraction in the American mode. Nothing about them resembles splattered canvas or color-field haze. Jones built her abstractions from design. A mask face might anchor the center of the canvas, surrounded by bands of saturated color, zigzags, triangles and motifs borrowed from woven cloth. The effect is closer to applied art and textile design than to Abstract Expressionism, which makes sense given her early training in design and illustration.

This matters if you are thinking about how such a picture translates into a print. Strong flat color and hard-edged pattern survive reproduction well, better than subtle tonal painting does. A viewer considering a canvas edition of a patterned composition, the way one might buy the canvas edition of a harbor scene, should expect the graphic quality to carry over almost intact. The range of her subjects is covered elsewhere in the most common subjects in her work.

Traits of the later work

Central mask or symbolic forms rather than naturalistic figures
Saturated, high-contrast color laid in flat, unmodulated areas
Repeating geometric motifs drawn from textile traditions
Compositions organized by design logic rather than depth or perspective

Reading the Shift in a Reproduction

Because the abstract work is graphic by nature, it behaves differently on a wall than her portraits do. A figurative Jones print reads as a picture of something. An abstract one reads as pattern and color first, and it changes a room more aggressively. It also pairs differently with furniture, since the dominant note is chromatic rather than narrative. Anyone weighing that choice can compare the two modes directly in choosing between a canvas print and a framed poster.

Scale is the other variable. The later compositions are dense, and at small sizes the pattern can turn busy. A larger format gives the bands and motifs room to breathe, which is worth considering before settling on dimensions. Guidance on sizing appears in what size print fits a small bedroom, and the same logic applies in reverse for generous walls. The abstract work rewards space.

Her abstraction came from textiles and masks, not from the New York school, and it reads that way.

Period	Dominant mode	What to expect in a print
1930s to 1950s	Figurative portraits, landscapes, still lifes	Tonal subtlety, narrative subject, quieter wall presence
Late 1960s onward	Pattern, mask forms, near-abstract design	Flat saturated color, graphic punch, strong at large scale

The two modes of Lois Mailou Jones

Key takeaways

Jones did paint abstractly, with the strongest examples dating from the late 1960s and after.
Her abstraction is design-based, built from masks and textile motifs rather than gestural gesture.
The graphic, flat-color character of the later work translates well to reproduction.
The abstract compositions read best at larger sizes, where the pattern has room to resolve.

Related questions

Why did Lois Mailou Jones turn toward abstraction later in her career?

Her later work drew heavily on African masks, textiles and the imagery of Haiti, where she traveled and taught. These sources pushed her toward symbol, pattern and flattened composition. The shift was gradual across the middle decades, and by the 1970s the design-driven mode dominated her output.

Is Lois Mailou Jones considered an abstract artist?

Not primarily. She is usually described as a figurative painter with a significant abstract phase, which is a fair summary. Her reputation rests on the full range of a long career, and the abstract compositions are one chapter of it rather than the whole story.

Do her abstract compositions work well as prints?

Generally yes. Flat color and hard-edged pattern reproduce cleanly, so little is lost in translation. The main caution is scale, because dense pattern can feel crowded at small sizes. A larger canvas or framed edition lets the composition breathe the way the original does.

From the Auvrique collection

Made to order · Every size