Sutherland Print Sizes And What Each One Costs

The size ladder for Graham Sutherland reproductions is simple, but the price curve is not. Where the money goes, and which step of the ladder earns it.

Auvrique Editorial · Fine Art Editions

The short answer

The most popular sizes for Graham Sutherland prints are 30x40cm, 50x70cm and 70x100cm, with 60x90cm close behind. Price rises roughly with area, not with the linear dimension, so a 70x100cm print can cost two to three times a 50x70cm of the same format. Mid sizes usually offer the best cost efficiency per square centimetre.

The sizes buyers actually choose

Three sizes dominate the reproduction market for Sutherland's work. The small format, around 30x40cm, suits studies and the tighter landscapes. The middle band, 50x70cm and 60x90cm, is where most sales land, because it fits a standard wall without dominating a room. The large format, 70x100cm and above, is the choice for the thorn paintings and the industrial scenes, which carry a lot of dark, dense detail.

Sutherland's compositions reward scale. His forms are organic and tangled, and at 30x40cm some of that structure flattens into texture. If the work you have in mind is one of the green Welsh landscapes or a later tapestry design, it will read better at 60x90cm or larger. Smaller formats suit the more graphic, high-contrast images. The subjects themselves, covered in more detail elsewhere, should drive the size as much as the wall does.

How price scales with size

Reproduction pricing tracks area, and area grows faster than the numbers suggest. A 50x70cm print has roughly twice the surface of a 30x40cm, and a 70x100cm has about four times the area of the small format. Framing adds a second curve, since frame cost rises with the perimeter and with glass size. A large framed poster can cost noticeably more than the same image on canvas, where the stretcher replaces the frame entirely.

The practical consequence is that the cost efficiency of different Sutherland print dimensions peaks in the middle. Small prints are cheap but deliver the least image. Large prints deliver the most image but at a steep per-unit considered once framing is counted. For a skeptical buyer, the honest advice is to spend at 50x70cm or 60x90cm unless the wall genuinely demands 70x100cm. If you have settled on the format question already, the framed poster edition shows how a mid-size piece is priced in practice.

What drives the price

Print area, which grows quadratically as both dimensions increase
Framing, which adds cost per perimeter centimetre and rises sharply at large sizes
Canvas versus framed poster, since canvas skips the frame and often the glass
Paper and ink specifications, which matter more at large sizes where flaws show

Whether the large format earns its cost

The case for going large is strongest with Sutherland's darker, denser works. A 70x100cm print of one of the thorn pictures or a gnarled landscape holds the viewer from across a room, and that viewing distance is the real benchmark. A print hung where it is seen from two metres earns its size. One seen from half a metre does not, and the money would be better spent on a mid-size with better framing.

The case against is straightforward. Large prints need large walls, and a 70x100cm piece in a small room reads as pressure rather than presence. If you are weighing the trade-off for a specific space, the small-room sizing question is answered separately. For most buyers, the canvas edition at a mid size is the sensible ceiling, and anything bigger is a deliberate choice, not a default.

A print hung where nobody stands back far enough to see it has been paid for at the wrong rate.

Size	Typical price band	Visual impact	Best suited to
30x40cm	Lowest band, entry level	Reads as an object, detail compressed	Studies, desks, gallery walls
50x70cm	Roughly double the small format	Comfortable focal point at seated distance	Most rooms, most subjects
60x90cm	Mid-to-upper band	Strong presence, holds from across a room	Landscapes and dense compositions
70x100cm	Two to three times the 50x70cm	Dominant, needs viewing distance	Large walls, dark detailed works

Indicative size and price comparison for reproduction prints, same format unless noted

Key takeaways

The three most popular sizes are 30x40cm, 50x70cm and 70x100cm, with 60x90cm a strong fourth.
Price scales with area, so each linear step up costs more than the last one did.
Mid sizes between 50x70cm and 60x90cm offer the best cost efficiency per square centimetre.
Go large only when the wall and the viewing distance justify it, since Sutherland's dense work needs space to read.

Related questions

Does a larger Sutherland print always look better?

No. Sutherland's compositions are dense and organic, and they benefit from scale, but only if the viewing distance allows it. A 70x100cm print in a corridor or a small bedroom will read as crowded. Measure the wall and the distance you will actually see the print from before committing to the top of the size range.

Is canvas cheaper than a framed print at the same size?

Usually, yes, because canvas stretches over a wooden frame rather than needing a moulding, glazing and mount. At larger sizes the gap widens, since framing costs climb steeply. Canvas also weighs less, which matters at 70x100cm. The trade-off is the look, and the framed-versus-canvas question is covered in its own guide.

What size should I start with if I am unsure?

Start at 50x70cm. It is the most forgiving size, fits most walls, and costs roughly half of what a 70x100cm of the same format does. If it feels too small after a few weeks, the wall and the viewing distance will tell you, and that is better information than any size chart.

From the Auvrique collection

Made to order · Every size