The larger framed poster does not print at higher resolution
Print quality in a framed poster is set by the source file and the printer, not by the paper size. The bigger format changes scale and viewing distance, and it changes the price, but it does not add detail that was not already captured.
No. The 60x90 cm and 70x100 cm framed posters are printed from the same master file at the same output resolution, so the larger size does not contain more detail. The difference is physical scale and price, not image quality. A bigger poster is only better if the original image has enough information to hold up at the larger dimensions without softening.
What print resolution actually measures
Print resolution is a measure of how many ink dots sit in each inch of paper, and it is set by the printer profile, not by the frame size you choose. A 60x90 cm poster and a 70x100 cm poster from the same edition are normally produced at the same dots per inch, so the larger sheet does not gain sharpness. What changes is the physical size of each dot on the wall, which is why the larger format can look softer if the source file is short on information.
The relevant question is whether the original image has enough pixels to fill the bigger sheet without being enlarged past its comfortable limit. If the source is a high resolution scan of a painting, both sizes can hold fine detail. If the source is a smaller file, the 70x100 cm version may show a slight loss of edge definition that the 60x90 cm version hides. That is a property of the file, not of the frame.
Where the two sizes actually differ
The honest comparison is not about resolution but about scale, viewing distance, and the price you pay for the extra surface. A 70x100 cm poster reads from further back and suits a larger wall, while a 60x90 cm poster sits more comfortably above a console or in a narrower room. The frame itself adds the same border treatment to both, so the frame is not the source of any quality gap.
If you are weighing the price difference, the thing to check is whether the larger size is justified by the room it will occupy, not by an expectation of richer detail. A bigger poster is a bigger object, and it costs more to ship and to frame. It is not a higher grade of print. For a reader who wants the work to hold detail at close range, the smaller size can be the safer choice when the source file is modest.
What changes and what does not
- Print resolution is set by the file and the printer, not by the poster size.
- The larger format does not add detail that was not already in the source image.
- Viewing distance and wall space are the real reasons to choose the bigger size.
- Price rises with size because of paper area and framing, not because of a quality upgrade.
How to decide between the two sizes
Start with the room, not with the price tag. Measure the wall and decide how far back you will stand when you look at the piece. If the poster will be seen mostly from a few feet away, the 60x90 cm format is often enough and it keeps the image within a comfortable enlargement range. If the same work will be viewed from across a larger room, the 70x100 cm format can read more clearly at that distance.
The second check is the source file behind the edition. A high resolution scan of a Maurice Boitel painting can support either size without obvious softening, while a smaller file may favor the more modest format. If you want to compare the two side by side for a specific work, the choice is usually about where the piece will live and how much wall it should command. what size print fits a small bedroom is the closer question for most buyers than any claim about resolution.
A bigger poster is a bigger object, not a sharper one. The detail was decided before the paper was cut.
| 60x90 cm | 70x100 cm | What this means |
|---|---|---|
| Same print resolution as the larger size when both come from one edition | Same print resolution as the smaller size when both come from one edition | Size does not raise resolution by itself |
| Smaller enlargement of the source file, so edge detail is easier to hold | Larger enlargement of the source file, so detail depends more on file quality | The source file matters more at the bigger size |
| Fits a narrower wall or a console scale | Fits a wider wall and a longer viewing distance | Choose by room, not by presumed quality |
| Lower paper area and framing cost | Higher paper area and framing cost | The price gap is about size, not grade |
60x90 cm versus 70x100 cm framed poster
Key takeaways
- Both sizes are printed at the same output resolution when they share one edition.
- The larger format does not add detail that the source file did not already contain.
- Choose the bigger size for wall space and viewing distance, not for sharper image quality.
- A smaller file favors the 60x90 cm format because it needs less enlargement.
Related questions
Can the larger poster look softer than the smaller one?
Yes, if the source file does not have enough pixels for the bigger enlargement. The printer is not adding information, so any softening comes from stretching the same file across more paper. When the source is strong, the difference is minimal at normal viewing distance.
Does a bigger frame improve the image quality?
No. The frame changes the border and the overall scale on the wall, but it does not change the printed image underneath. A larger frame around the same print does not make the print itself sharper or more detailed.
Which size is better for a detailed painting?
The one that matches the room and the viewing distance. A detailed painting can work well in either format if the source file is high resolution. If you plan to stand close, the smaller size is less demanding on the file and often the safer choice.
From the Auvrique collection
Made to order · Every sizeEvery size, every country, delivery included
Editions are made to order and shipped worldwide. Choose a format and a size, and the price you see is the price you pay.
View the collectionPart of our guide to canvas or framed poster.



